Circulation: The RIEMA Blog

The discussion place of the Rhode Island Educational Media Association

A Role by Any Other Name Would Smell As Sweet. Or Would It?

February 6th, 2007 · 4 Comments
Job Description · SLMS vs. Teacher Librarian

bee and blossom picture, © 2006 Zach Berger
Photo © 2006 Zach Berger

This is not a picture of your average rose. But I’m sitting here in the Ocean State, after all. A rose ragosa, or “beach rose,” is an appropriate image. (We could all use a shot of summer right about now, anyway.) And, no, that is not a typo in the title of this post. I meant to write “role” instead of “rose.” Otherwise, I’d apologize for the purposely mangled reference to Shakespeare, except that I am trying to make a point:

Just what should the 21st century school-employed librarian be called?

Anyone who’s recently been through a library grad school program or who is working in the field knows that a common designation for the past several years has been School Library Media Specialist, or SLMS. I’d be curious to hear from any veterans who may remember when this title began to catch on.

My hunch is that more and more ’school librarians’ started to become ‘media specialists’ when it became increasingly important to attach greater degrees of relevance to the profession in order to stave off budget bombs and job eliminations. Yes, the rise and integration of the many forms of technological media significantly changed the profession, but this is true of librarianship in general. So why aren’t there “Public Library Media Specialists,” and so on?

Some SLMSs are more comfortable calling themselves ‘plain old’ school librarians. Full disclosure: I happen to be one of them. I almost never use the SLMS title. Too cumbersome. But neither do I want the full scope of our roles as instructional partner, information specialist, program administrator, and teacher (thank you, Information Power!) to be ignored or taken for granted.

Is it time to retire the SLMS moniker (which, after all, is now in the pot along with PBGR, GSE, GLE, IEP, SIT, NCLB, PLP, SALT, AP, ELL, and dozens of other mouth-soup ingredients) and use something that is at once instantly recognizable and instantly powerful? What do you call yourself? Is there an alternative title that should be considered? (Personally, I kind of enjoy Limedian, but that’s just me.)

I’ve heard that Canadians commonly use the title Teacher Librarian. Perhaps our neighbors are onto something. Keep in mind that it is imperative that we continue to move forward as a profession and (re)position ourselves as primary facilitators of student learning.

Speaking of primary facilitators, this is a good time to introduce Jackie, esteemed RIEMA President and the co-moderator of Circulation: The RIEMA Blog, to get her take on this debate. Take it away, Jackie!

Thanks, Zach.

My 27 year-old son told me this story recently. He was talking with Christine, a friend of his who is a substitute history teacher. He mentioned that his mother was a teacher, too. The conversation went back and forth about where I worked and what I taught. Finally, Christine said, “You know, technically your mother is a library media specialist.”

My son knew this, of course. He told me that he never tells people that I’m a library media specialist, because they don’t know what it means. He called me right away to tell me that Christine knew. It was a first! (Of course I responded that he should ask her out, she seems very intelligent.)

Why are we still insisting that we are library media specialists? To me, specialist implies a technical expertise in a specific skill rather than a professional. Look at a list of specialist job titles if you want to check this out. Our patrons and the general public know what a librarian does, because we demonstrate it each and every day. Doctors are still doctors even though they do not practice medicine the same way they did 50 or 100 years ago. The same is true of other professionals.

What’s in a title? To Nicholas, a kindergarten student who calls me Mrs. Librarian, it is my name. By the time he leaves my school he will know that it’s my job and that a librarian loves books and reading, can guide him to satisfy his information needs and can help him show what he knows.

Thanks, Jackie. Now let’s hear from our colleagues. What say you, readers? School Library Media Specialist, Teacher Librarian, or something else? What’s in a name? And how should that name define us, our workplaces, and our relationships with our patrons and co-workers?

Discuss. It’ll take your mind off of the cold.

Create a free edublog to get your own comment avatar (and more!)

4 responses so far ↓

  • 1    ucaplibrarian // Feb 7, 2007 at 7:48 pm

    I am so happy that you have brought this up. Every time I fill out a form that asks me for my title I have this debate with myself. I also feel that SLMS is a bit cumbersome but the name has to have evolved for a reason. School Librarian is short and to the point. Teacher Librarian seems to cover it a bit more as we do what other librarians do but also have teaching certification/ teach. If I was forced to choose today, I think I would be called a Teacher Librarian. I do not think there is a name that would be short to the point and able to cover all we do. The director of my school feels I should call myself whatever I want to be called. I would love to hear what others have to say about this. Love the new blog!!

    Darshell Silva

  • 2    dorothyfe // Feb 8, 2007 at 5:59 am

    I also like the title Teacher/Librarian. To get the support that school libraries need, we must be perceived as a vital partner in student achievement in our schools.

    If you are interested in evidence that good school libraries do have a proven effect on student achievement, visit The Library Research Service at http://www.lrs.org/impact.asp

    Dorothy Frechette

  • 3    JenS // Feb 9, 2007 at 4:40 am

    I agree with previous posts, SLMS is cumbersome so I use “librarian” when I sign something like emails etc. I use “teacher” as Jackie does when someone asks me what I do for a living. The Kindergarteners call my “Library Teacher”. That’s my favorite.

    But I do like SLMS for the technical functions we provide that are less visible to administration. I spent much of my “free time” this week supporting AV equipment to provide classroom video clips for district Professional Development goals. I frequently provide computer support to teachers and staff.

    I don’t think it’s the label that’s important but how we promote what we do and the value of our role. Like many districts, there will be severe cuts and tough decisions made for next year. Specialists at our elementary schools are “being looked at”. My union reps asked me for a list of how many classes I teach. She said, “I know you do lots of other stuff..but I don’t know what that is, so put that on the list too.” I provided that and a list of all the “other stuff”. We’ll have to wait and see on the impact of my list. I’ll be looking for ways to make sure the “stuff” is more visible.

    I’d be interested in hearing what others do to spread the word.

    Jen Simoneau

  • 4    PattiV // Nov 5, 2007 at 1:41 pm

    I also like Teacher-Librarian or Library Teacher. The general population at large “gets” “Librarian” as not only the person who helps them with books, but also the person who helps them with technology-based information sources. Why mess with a good thing? Also, as we prepare students for life out there in the “real world,” whent hey go to a public, college, or special library, the professional who is going to help them is a “Librarian.” Real-world application, understandability, and easier to type, all in one title. What’s not to love about it?

Leave a Comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image